Kinds of Management and Skills of Managers
Kinds of Management
The most common view considers three basic levels; top, middle, and first line managers.
• Top managers
Top managers make up the relatively small group of executives who control the organization Titles found in the group include president, vice president, and chief executive officer (C.E.O).
They establish organization’s goals, overall strategy and operating policies. They officially represent the organization to the external environment by meeting with government officials, executives of other organization’s etc.
The job is likely to be complex and varied. They make decisions about such activities as acquiring other companies, investing, research and development, entering or abandoning various markets, and building new plants and office facilities. They often work long hours and spend much of their time in meetings or on the telephone.
• Middle managers
Probably the largest group of managers in most organization.
Common middle management titles title’s including:
i. Plant Managers
ii. Operation Manager
iii. Head of Division
Middle managers are primarily responsible for implementing the policies and plans developed by top management and for supervising and coordinating the activities of lower level managers. Plant managers for example handle inventory management, quality control equipment facilities, minor union problems and co-ordinate the work of supervisors within the plant.
Note: Thinning ranks of middle managers lowers cost and rid organization of excess bureaucracy.
• First line managers
These managers supervise and coordinate the activities of operating employees.
Common titles are:
I. Foreman
II. Supervisor
III. Office manager
These are the first positions held by employees who enter management from the ranks of operating personnel. They typically spend large proportion of their time supervising the work of subordinates.
Differentiation by Areas of Management
Regardless of their level, managers may work in various areas within an organization for example, marketing, financial operation, human resource, administrative, and other kinds of manager’s at all three levels.
i. Marketing managers
They work in areas relating to the marketing function, getting consumers, and clients to buy the organization products or services.These areas include new product development, promotion and distribution. Marketing is of great importance to virtually all organizations, thus it is critical to develop good managers.
ii. Financial managers
Deals primarily with an organization financial resources. They are responsible for activities such as accounting, cash management, and investments.
iii. Operations manager
They are concerned with creating and managing the systems that create organizations products and services .Their responsibilities include production control, inventory control, quality control, and plant layout and site selection.
iv. Human resource managers
They are responsible for hiring and developing employees. They are typically involved in human resource planning:
♤ Employee recruitment and selection
♤ Training and development
♤ Designing compensation and benefits system
♤ Formulating performance appraisal systems and discharging low performance and problem employees
v. Administrative managers
Also called general managers. They are not associated with any particular management specialty. For example, clinic or hospital administrators.
They tend to be generalized. They have some basic familiarity with all functional areas of management rather than specialized training in any one area.
CRITICAL ROLES AND SKILLS OF MANAGERS
Managerial roles
Managers play ten different roles and these roles fall into three basic categories;
♤ Interpersonal
♤ Informational
♤ Decisional
a) Interpersonal roles
They include figure head, leader and liaison role.
i. Figure head –Taking visitors to dinner, attending ribbon-cutting ceremonies, etc. These activities are typically more ceremonial and symbolic than substantive.
ii. Leader –Hiring ,training and motivating employees. A manager who formally or informally shows subordinates how to do things and how to perform under pressure is leading.
iii. Liaison role –Often involves serving as a coordinator or link between groups or organizations.
b) Informational roles
The three informational roles flow naturally from the interpersonal roles. The process of carrying out these roles place the manager at a strategic point to gather and disseminate information. These roles include the monitor, disseminator, and spokesperson.
i. Monitor – One who actively seeks information that may be of value .The manager questions subordinates, is receptive to unsolicited information, and attempts to be as well informed as possible.
ii. Disseminator – Manager is a disseminator of information, transmitting relevant information back to others in the workplace. Being a monitor and disseminator the manager is vital link in the organizations chains of communication.
iii. Spokesperson –This focuses on external communication. The spokesperson formerly relays information to people outside the unit or outside the organization.
c) Decisional roles
The information acquired by the mangers as a result of performing the informational roles has a significant bearing on important decisions that they make, that is, entrepreneur disturbance handler, resource allocator, and negotiator.
i. Entrepreneur –This is the voluntary initiator of change, then sell it to other skeptical managers inside the compound.
ii. Disturbance handler – Manager handles such problems as strikes, copyright infringements, and energy shortages.
iii. Resource allocator – As a resource allocator, the manager decides how resources are distributed and with whom he/she will work most closely. A manager typically allocates the funds in the unit’s operating budgets among the unit’s members and projects.
iv. Negotiator – The manager enters into negotiations with other groups or organization as representative of the company. For example, managers may negotiate a union contract, an agreement with a consultant, or a long-term relationship with a supplier.
Negotiations may also be internal to the organization. The manager may for instance, negotiate a dispute between two subordinates or negotiate with another department for additional support.
Our Standard Review
Date created: 16 Aug 2024 09:25:35
Critical Evaluation:
The article provides a structured overview of management roles and levels within an organization. It categorizes managers into three tiers: top, middle, and first-line, each with distinct responsibilities. The arguments presented are logical and follow a clear progression, making it easy for readers to understand the hierarchical nature of management. However, the text could benefit from more concrete examples to illustrate the roles and responsibilities of each level. For instance, mentioning a specific company or scenario where a top manager made a significant decision would strengthen the argument.
While the article appears to be objective, it does not delve into the challenges faced by managers at each level, which could provide a more balanced view. Discussing the pressures and expectations on managers, especially in today’s fast-paced business environment, could enhance the article's relevance. The implications of the management structure in real-world scenarios, such as how effective management can lead to organizational success or failure, are also missing.
Quality of Information:
The language used in the article is straightforward and accessible, making it suitable for a broad audience. Technical terms like "resource allocator" and "disturbance handler" are introduced without adequate explanation, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with management jargon. Providing definitions or examples for these terms would improve comprehension.
The information appears generally accurate, but the lack of citations or references raises questions about its reliability. There are no indications of misleading information or logical fallacies, but the absence of empirical evidence or case studies weakens the article's authority. The article does not seem to present new ideas; instead, it summarizes existing knowledge about management roles. While this is valuable, it would be more impactful if it included recent trends or research in management practices.
Use of Evidence and References:
The article does not reference any sources to support its claims, which is a significant gap. The lack of evidence makes it difficult to assess the credibility of the information presented. For a more robust discussion, including studies or expert opinions on management practices would enhance the article's validity. Additionally, citing real-world examples or case studies would provide concrete evidence to support the claims made about managerial roles and responsibilities.
Further Research and References:
Further exploration could focus on the evolving nature of management in response to technological advancements and changing workforce dynamics. Researching the impact of remote work on management styles or the role of emotional intelligence in effective leadership could provide valuable insights. Readers might benefit from literature on contemporary management theories or case studies illustrating successful management practices in diverse industries.
Questions for Further Research:
- How do management roles differ across various industries?
- What are the challenges faced by middle managers in today's corporate environment?
- How has technology changed the way managers perform their roles?
- What skills are most critical for effective first-line managers?
- How do cultural differences impact management styles in multinational organizations?
- What are the best practices for developing future leaders within an organization?
- How does emotional intelligence influence managerial effectiveness?
- What role does employee feedback play in shaping management strategies?
- How do organizations measure the success of their management practices?
- What are the implications of remote work on traditional management structures?
Rate This Post
Rate The Educational Value
Rate The Ease of Understanding and Presentation
Interesting or Boring? Rate the Entertainment Value