Theories of Counseling: Behavior & Psycho-social
Theories of Addiction
♧ Behavior Model of Addiction
Rather than viewing "addiction" as anything particularly mysterious, behaviorists see addictive behaviors as part of a larger class of "excess" behaviors: an operantly conditioned response that, as a result of the individual's history of prior reinforcement and punishment, tends to occur at a high rate relative to other more socially desirable or productive responses, and thus is maladaptive. The torments of withdrawal suffer from popular exaggeration; for example, in an attempt to describe heroin withdrawal in objective terms, experts have said that it is roughly equivalent to a severe case of an intestinal or flu virus, with chills, shakes, cramps and nausea - unpleasant, yes, but life-altering...?
With respect to the widely-used narcotic pain-killers just referred to, yes, most of those who use these prescriptions do report experiencing withdrawal when they stop, but they still stop. In other words, there is good reason to believe that the behavior of addicts might be nothing more complicated than a habit. They engage in the behavior because that is what they are in the habit of doing, that's how they have been conditioned to behave.
Behavioral concepts and principles can be applied in many ways to addiction:
♤ Psychoactive drugs can be very potent reinforcers, both positive (euphoria, potency, sociability, peer acceptance) and negative (tension-reduction, escape from boredom, "drowning one's sorrows,")
♤ Relief from withdrawal symptoms by resumed use of drugs can be a very potent negative reinforce. The reinforcers of substance use might be stronger than their punishers (hangovers, arrests, social disapproval, getting fired), and the reinforcers are usually more immediate and certain while punishers are often delayed and uncertain
♤ The desire or craving can generalize to a variety of stimuli that prompt the behavior, and there might be a failure to discriminate when to use or not use, or when one has had too much. With so many reinforcers and conditioned stimuli, extinction can be hard to achieve, and spontaneous recovery (relapse) is common
Behaviorists use these and other concepts to deal with four separate issues: the factors associated with initiation of use, maintenance of use, cessation of use, and slip or relapse (resumption of use).
To a behaviorist, the behavior of consuming alcohol or some other drug can be understood in terms of conditioning of specific associations, also known as expectancies:
♤ The expectation of taking a drug (which to a "mentalist" would be understood in terms of "need" or "desire" or "craving," terms that behaviorists try to avoid)
♤ The expectation of the type of effect that taking the drug will produce.
♤ The expectation of the consequences that will occur as a result of taking the drug
Some studies suggest that alcoholics cannot easily determine their degree of intoxication on internal cues alone and if given external cues, or feedback, they are much less likely to drink to intoxication ("blood alcohol discrimination")
♧ Bio-psychosocial model of Addiction
Addiction is recognized as a complex disorder that involves biological, psychological, social, and spiritual components and therefore must be conceptualized and treated utilizing the biopsychosocial-spiritual model.
A clinical and preventative approach to addiction is much more effective than the traditional punitive approaches taken by the criminal justice system. As we move away from the past approaches to addiction toward more innovation, we now understand that addiction is a “brain disease” that affects all areas of life and requires long-term comprehensive integrated treatment.
Many variables have shaped the understanding of addiction over time including historical, cultural, political, economic, and societal influences, which in turn have determined our approaches to managing the devastating and far-reaching consequences of substance misuse and related addictive behaviors. As the addiction treatment field has evolved, it continues to move away from punitive dogmatic approaches to more client centered holistic approaches.
Strengths based models of addiction treatment integrate a variety of influential components that enhance the understanding and ability to effectively treat the entire individual within his or her social, cultural, psychological, and biological contexts.
Effective and integrated treatment models offer hope, guidance, dignity, and respect for the suffering individual. When treating individuals suffering from substance use disorders and co-occurring disorders one of the most valuable messages offered is the unwavering belief that recovery is possible and that the individual possesses the inherent capacity to heal and find wholeness again.
Addiction brings the individual to a place characterized by complete hopelessness and despair. Strengths based treatment modalities offer the individual a restored sense of possibility and hope. Without this, the suffering individual is unlikely to take the necessary steps toward positive change which reduces the shame and stigma often associated with addiction. It is through compassion, fellowship, and the resilience of the human spirit that destructive beliefs and assumptions can be challenged and replaced with an appreciation for the individual’s inherent strengths and ability to heal.
Addiction, once considered to be an inherent moral failing, is now better understood as a “brain disease” that requires a biopsychosocial-spiritual approach to treatment. The strengths-based approach to addiction treatment highlights the individual’s inherent resilience and ability to recover, as opposed to more traditional perspectives from the past that focus exclusively on pathology. This paradigmatic shift in understanding of mental illness is a key component to reducing the stigma associated with addiction.
This proactive approach to addiction treatment that includes preventative measures and compassionate innovative treatment that empowers and educates individuals, the hope is that recovery is becoming more accessible and successful than it has been before. The integration of a variety of treatment approaches and options coupled with cultural shifts in the conceptualization of addiction are yielding encouraging outcomes and growing opportunities to continue positive developments in the field of addiction treatment.
Our Standard Review
Date created: 16 Aug 2024 06:15:43
Critical Evaluation:
The article presents a clear and logical exploration of addiction through two primary models: the behavior model and the bio-psychosocial model. The arguments are coherent, suggesting that addiction can be understood as a conditioned behavior and a complex disorder influenced by multiple factors. However, the article could strengthen its arguments by providing more empirical evidence or specific studies that support the claims made, particularly regarding the effectiveness of the biopsychosocial approach.
While the article attempts to present a balanced view, it leans towards the idea that addiction is primarily a conditioned behavior, which may oversimplify the complexity of addiction. This could lead to a misunderstanding of the various factors that contribute to addiction, such as genetic predispositions or environmental influences. The implications of these ideas are significant, as they suggest that treatment should focus on behavior modification rather than solely on addressing underlying psychological issues.
Quality of Information:
The language used in the article is generally accessible, making it easy for a broad audience to understand the concepts discussed. Technical terms, such as "operantly conditioned response" and "biopsychosocial model," are introduced without sufficient explanation, which may confuse readers unfamiliar with psychological terminology.
The information appears to be accurate and reliable, with no overt signs of fake news or misleading content. However, the article does not cite specific studies or data, which raises questions about the reliability of the claims made. The ethical standards of research are not explicitly addressed, leaving readers uncertain about the credibility of the information presented. The article introduces some new ideas, particularly regarding the strengths-based approach, but largely reiterates established concepts in addiction treatment.
Use of Evidence and References:
The article lacks specific references to studies or data that would enhance the credibility of its claims. While it discusses various concepts related to addiction, it does not provide evidence to support these ideas. For instance, the assertion that behavioral concepts can be applied to addiction treatment would benefit from references to empirical studies that demonstrate the effectiveness of such approaches. The absence of citations creates gaps in the evidence, making it difficult for readers to assess the validity of the claims.
Further Research and References:
Further research could explore the effectiveness of different treatment models for addiction, particularly the strengths-based approach compared to traditional methods. Additionally, examining the role of social and environmental factors in addiction could provide a more comprehensive understanding of the issue.
Readers may find it useful to explore literature on the following topics:
- The impact of genetic factors on addiction
- Comparative studies of treatment outcomes for different addiction models
- The role of community support in recovery from addiction
Questions for Further Research:
- How do genetic factors influence an individual's susceptibility to addiction?
- What specific studies support the effectiveness of the biopsychosocial model in addiction treatment?
- How do social and environmental factors contribute to the development of addictive behaviors?
- What are the long-term outcomes of strengths-based treatment approaches compared to traditional methods?
- How does stigma affect individuals seeking treatment for addiction?
- What role does peer support play in the recovery process for individuals with substance use disorders?
- How can addiction treatment be tailored to address cultural differences among individuals?
- What are the psychological mechanisms behind cravings and relapse in addiction?
- How effective are preventative measures in reducing the incidence of addiction?
- What innovations in addiction treatment are currently being researched or implemented?
Rate This Post
Rate The Educational Value
Rate The Ease of Understanding and Presentation
Interesting or Boring? Rate the Entertainment Value