Milestones in Psychometrics
Establishment of Ethical Guidelines
As psychological tests grew in popularity, the important needs for the ethical use of such measures were recognized early and multiple national and international efforts have been made to address the issue.
The International Test Commission (ITC) was established in 1976 to support the ethical development and use of psychological testing across the world. In the United States, the American Psychological Association (APA) 2010 developed standards of the psychological use of tests and the current APA guidelines under standard of including recent 2010 amendments, address a multitude of issues relevant to the practice of assessment.
Such topics include, the basis and use of assessment, informed consent, release of data, test construction, interpreting of results, qualification and competency of practice as well as test security (APA, 2010). The APA code also includes particular guidelines for clinicians using automated test scoring and interpretation services.
Transition into the computer age
The role of computers has increased significantly in the area of psychological testing and computers have resulted in the more sophisticated and advanced psychometrics techniques that contributed to a radical change in the way testing is done.
Computers are used for administrative tasks, research purposes and for direct clinical applications. Computers have continuously increased the role in clinical assessment, interviews, diagnosis, instruction, treatment, intervention, clinical consultations, and psychiatric interviews.
With these historical roots and with infrastructure provided by the emerging scientific societies, by the second half of the 20th century psychometrics had started out its intellectual turf; psychological setting, educational, psychological measurement, and factor analysis.
Extensions of these three topics, along with numerous contributions to applied statistics motivated by the data collection in empirical psychology, have defined the field through the second half of the last century and into the 21st century. The DSM-iv is the abbreviated term of Diagnostic and statistical manual of mental disorders, the fourth edition, published by the American Psychiatric Association Washington D.C 1994, which is the main diagnostic reference of mental health professionals in the U.S
The origins of personality testing date back to the 18th and 19th centuries, when personality was assessed through phrenology, the measurement of the human skull, and physiognomy which assessed personality based on a person’s outer appearance, these pseudoscientific methods were replaced by more modern methods in the 20th century.
Testing for proficiency dates back to 2200BC, when the Chinese emperor used cruelty tests to assess office subordinates. Psychometrics dates to Sir Francis Galton (1822-1911), who was interested in individual differences and their distribution. In 1884-1890, he tested 17,000 individuals on height, weight, size of accessible body parts and behavior, hand strength and visual accity. It demonstrated its objective tests that could provide meaningful scores. In 1890, James Cattell, first used the term ‘mental test’, mostly motor and acuity tests. He also founded psychological review (1897).
Modern intelligence testing began with the work of Alfred Binet, a French psychologist who published the first intelligence test in 1905. Binet’s scale measured a child’s mental age. David Wechsler advised the original Binet scale to produce the standard-Binet scale test in 1916. It introduced the intelligence tests for adults and series of IQ tests. It reduced emphasis on verbal ability, and introduced a new scoring system based on its normal distribution. Today there are many individual and group intelligence tests. An individual IQ test is administered to a single examinee by a psychologist who has special training for its purpose. Group IQ test can be administered to many people simultaneously.
Milestones in Psychometrics
1810: Gall and Spurzheim created phrenology, the science ‘bumps’. They invented decorative charts showing the relationship between bumps on the skull and human personality.
1860s: The Gall and Spurzheim model is discredited, but leaves conventional medicine with a new model that describes mental and emotional abilities.
1865-1879: Victorians from Britain travel the globe to newer places and document that their testing devices show the ‘white sahib’ to be indeed more intelligent that his counterparts in any other region of the world. Francis Galton, one of the fathers of psychometrics, support this contention.
1879: The first ever psychological test in the laboratory is set in Leipzig, Germany by Wilhelm Wundt. His student, James Mckeen Cattell establishes the American Psychological Association.
1896: Cattell publishes his first paper, mental tests and measurement, listing 50 tests. Victor Henri proposes a test for the all-rounder. He suggests the need for the test of memory, imagery, imagination, aesthetic sense, attention, motor skills and strength and will.
1903s: Binet’s book ‘l’etude experimenale de l’intelligence’ lays the groundwork for standardizing intelligence tests.
1905s: Theodore produces the first ever intelligence scale for children.
1917s: intelligence tests are used extensively in the US army to test individuals. Robert uses this analogy of the tests to argue that Jews were so inferior they should be kept out of the country. The standard-Binnet intelligence was introduced.
1927s: Watson declares that all America is psychologically mad. A host of magazines spring up. Consequently claiming to help and test the Americans.
1939-1945: Nazis run tests on Jews showing pictures of naked women and evaluating results based on how their responses and attitudes change.
1960s: A big boom in tests, their number increase in a phenomenal rate.
1971-1977: Over 2000 tests documented which measure things from how clever the person is to team spirit in a basketball team.
1990s: over 8000 instruments in existence with two-three new instruments being added every day to this inventory.
Our Standard Review
Date created: 16 Aug 2024 08:00:34
Critical Evaluation:
The article presents a historical overview of psychological testing and the establishment of ethical guidelines, particularly through organizations like the International Test Commission (ITC) and the American Psychological Association (APA). The arguments made are generally logical, tracing the evolution of psychological testing from its early, pseudoscientific roots to modern practices. However, the article could strengthen its claims by providing more detailed examples of how ethical guidelines are applied in real-world testing scenarios.
While the article mentions various ethical considerations, such as informed consent and test security, it lacks depth in discussing the implications of these guidelines on practitioners and patients. Additionally, the historical context provided is informative but could benefit from a clearer connection to contemporary issues in psychological testing. The article appears to be fair in its presentation, but it could be perceived as biased due to its focus on Western developments in psychological testing, potentially overlooking contributions from other cultures.
Quality of Information:
The language used in the article is mostly clear, though some technical terms, such as "psychometrics" (the field of study concerned with the theory and technique of psychological measurement), could be better explained for a broader audience. The information seems accurate and reliable, with references to established organizations and historical figures in psychology. However, there are instances where the article could mislead readers, such as the implication that early methods like phrenology were entirely discredited without acknowledging any historical context or contributions to the field.
The article does not present any overt signs of fake news or logical fallacies, but it does repeat some well-known historical facts without offering new insights or perspectives. It adheres to ethical standards in research by citing reputable sources, but it could enhance its value by introducing fresh ideas or critiques of existing practices in psychological testing.
Use of Evidence and References:
The article references credible sources, including the APA and historical figures in psychology, which lends credibility to its claims. However, it lacks specific citations for some of the historical claims made, such as the impact of intelligence tests during World War I. More robust evidence, including recent studies or statistics on the effectiveness of ethical guidelines in testing, would strengthen the article's arguments. There are gaps in the evidence, particularly concerning the practical application of ethical guidelines in diverse settings.
Further Research and References:
Further exploration could focus on the impact of technology on psychological testing, particularly regarding automated scoring systems and their ethical implications. Additional literature on cross-cultural perspectives in psychological testing would also be beneficial, as well as studies examining the effectiveness of ethical guidelines in practice.
Questions for Further Research:
- How have ethical guidelines in psychological testing evolved in non-Western countries?
- What are the long-term effects of automated test scoring on patient outcomes?
- How do different cultures perceive psychological testing and its ethical implications?
- What role do ethical guidelines play in the development of new psychological tests?
- How can practitioners ensure informed consent in diverse populations?
- What are the challenges in maintaining test security in the digital age?
- How do ethical guidelines address the potential biases in psychological testing?
- What impact did the use of intelligence tests in the military have on public perceptions of psychology?
- How can psychological testing be adapted to better serve marginalized communities?
- What are the future trends in psychometrics and ethical considerations surrounding them?
Rate This Post
Rate The Educational Value
Rate The Ease of Understanding and Presentation
Interesting or Boring? Rate the Entertainment Value