Crisis Intervention Strategies
The inquest into the basics of crisis intervention strategies necessitates the understanding of a couple of terms. These include;
Crisis
A number of definitions arise that describe crisis. However, the most revered are by;
James (2008)
He defined crisis as being the perception or experiencing of an event or situation as an intolerable difficulty that exceeds the person’s current resources and coping mechanisms. He further reiterated that unless an individual receives relief, the crisis has the potential to result in severe affective, behavioral and cognitive malfunctioning.
Roberts (2005)
He defined crisis in an even more detailed way, stressing that it is an acute disruption of psychological homeostasis in which one’s usual coping mechanisms fail and there exists evidence of distress and functional impairment. The subjective reaction to a stressful life experience compromises the individual’s stability and ability to cope and function. The main cause of a crisis is an intensely stressful, traumatic or hazardous event. It is in this light that intervention comes in to restore a semblance of sanity.
Crisis Intervention
This is basically refers to the professional approach towards crisis situations or repercussions in a bid to curb chaos, restore normalcy or ease the impact of crisis. There are a number of strategies that thus can be employed to affect this.
Strategies
These are the planned moves or approaches towards tasks or the addressing of certain events. They are well thought out steps that are calculated to achieve some objectives. An example is creating awareness.
Crises vary in intensity and impact, from mild discomfort to destructive chaos. However, their impact is numerous and may often affect the psychological, physical, emotional or even social aspects of individual(s). This is why it is critical that therapists deeply analyze and understand the dynamics of individual's responses to and handling of tumultuous events. The following strategies can be used;
CRISIS INTERVENTION STRATEGIES
i). Creating Awareness
The crisis worker can promote an awareness of the feelings underlying a client’s behavior. For instance, someone who is suicidal may have not considered their reasons for living or dying. The worker can help them get awareness of these thoughts and feelings which helps give them new perspective.
ii). Allowing Catharsis
Catharsis is the expression of emotion, for therapeutic purposes. Clients may experience a range of emotions and behaviors, including crying, yelling, swearing, and so on as they vent about what they’re going through. As a client describes what’s going on in their life they may find themselves brought right back to the same emotional intensity when they originally experienced the situation, or even worse.
Someone who talks about a situation that made them powerless or angry will find their blood pressure rising, sweating and all the other physiological responses from the first time. Keep in mind that if a client is getting too elevated it may be more helpful to practice deep breathing and grounding exercises to bring the client back to the present.
iii). Providing Support
This strategy involves naturalizing the client’s response to what they’ve been going through. Often clients will think that they are crazy or that they are overreacting. Note, I didn’t use the word “normal”, because their suspended coping skills are not effective or even typical in someone who is not experiencing a crisis. They are however common, and we need to point out that they are natural given people who are so overwhelmed.
As an example of providing support, many people see suicidal behavior or an inability to cope as a sign of weakness, which can impair their ability to respond effectively. Pointing out that reaching out for help, the behavior that brought them into contact with the crisis worker in the first place, is itself a good response, and working with them to build a plan will help them feel less overwhelmed.
iv). Increasing Expansion
Increasing expansion involves helping clients get out of their tunnel vision. This is very common with suicidal individuals who are totally unable to see anything but hopelessness in their situation. By providing alternative perspectives, the client will begin to see that their situation can be different.
Re-framing in general is a very common strategy throughout crisis intervention and in therapy, especially cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT), where distorted thoughts are the cause of depression and suicidal thoughts.
v). Emphasizing Focus
When clients have the opposite of tunnel vision and their cognition are all over the place with no basis in reality, emphasizing focus becomes more important. This helps the client to focus on the specific causes of the crisis and break solutions down into manageable steps that help clients work through these things.
vi). Providing Guidance
Guidance involves providing information and referral services to clients, to help them fix specific issues in their life. This is more commonly achieved by case management in the long-term, but in the short-term may be performed by telephone or in-person crisis workers.
vii). Promoting Mobilization
Mobilization involves helping crisis workers access external supports. Because individuals in crisis have difficulty accessing their internal coping skills external and peripheral supports become more important. These include the people around them that they can trust and be supported by, and professional supports like counselors and therapists.
viii). Implementing Order
Implementing order helps clients break their problem down into manageable pieces and decide which ones are the most important. By dealing with the most important issues first, they’ll be able to get a sense of control and begin to take advantage of internal coping strategies.
ix). Providing Protection
Finally, providing protection involves protecting the client from their own self-injurious behavior and potentially harmful behavior towards others. Suicide and homicide risk assessment is an important part of this strategy, which is demonstrated throughout the crisis intervention process.
CONCLUSION
Crisis tends to unravel the inner capacity of human beings to deal with the worst that life could offer. However, this innate ability to bounce back from a crisis is often hindered by a number of factors. These may be:
♤ Physical stamina to stand intense pain.
♤ The validity and empathetic element of the support system an individual has.
♤ Experience or the influence of professional help availed to cope with the crisis.
Our Standard Review
Date created: 16 Aug 2024 09:35:13
Critical Evaluation:
The article presents a structured overview of crisis intervention strategies, effectively defining key terms such as "crisis" and "crisis intervention." The definitions provided by James (2008) and Roberts (2005) are well-articulated and highlight the psychological implications of a crisis. However, the article could enhance its arguments by incorporating more empirical evidence or case studies that illustrate the effectiveness of the strategies discussed. The reasoning is generally clear, but some sections could benefit from further elaboration to strengthen the connection between the definitions and the proposed strategies. The article appears to maintain a neutral tone, avoiding overt bias, which is important for a topic that requires sensitivity. The implications of the strategies in real-world scenarios, such as their application in therapy or emergency services, could be explored further to provide a more comprehensive understanding.
Quality of Information:
The language used in the article is mostly accessible, with technical terms like "catharsis" and "re-framing" explained in context. However, a brief definition of "cognitive behavioral therapy (CBT)" would enhance understanding for readers unfamiliar with psychological concepts. The information presented seems accurate and reliable, with no apparent signs of misinformation or logical fallacies. The article adheres to ethical standards by discussing sensitive topics like suicide and self-injury with care. While the strategies outlined are useful, the article does not introduce significantly new ideas; instead, it summarizes established concepts in crisis intervention. Nonetheless, it contributes valuable insights into the practical application of these strategies.
Use of Evidence and References:
The article references two key sources, James (2008) and Roberts (2005), which lend credibility to the definitions of crisis. However, it lacks a broader range of references to support the effectiveness of the intervention strategies. More empirical studies or expert opinions could strengthen the claims made about each strategy. There are gaps in evidence, particularly regarding the outcomes of implementing these strategies in real-life situations. Additional references could provide a more robust framework for understanding the effectiveness of crisis intervention.
Further Research and References:
Further exploration could focus on the long-term effects of crisis intervention strategies on individuals' mental health. Research could also investigate the training and qualifications needed for crisis workers to effectively implement these strategies. Additional literature on the integration of crisis intervention in various settings, such as schools or workplaces, would be beneficial.
Questions for Further Research:
- What are the long-term effects of crisis intervention strategies on mental health recovery?
- How do different cultural backgrounds influence the perception of crisis and the effectiveness of intervention strategies?
- What specific training do crisis workers receive to implement these strategies effectively?
- How can technology be utilized to enhance crisis intervention efforts?
- What role do family and community support systems play in the effectiveness of crisis intervention?
- Are there specific populations (e.g., youth, elderly) that respond differently to crisis intervention strategies?
- How can crisis intervention strategies be adapted for use in non-clinical settings?
- What are the ethical considerations in crisis intervention, particularly regarding confidentiality and consent?
- How do crisis intervention strategies differ across various mental health frameworks?
- What metrics can be used to evaluate the success of crisis intervention strategies?
Rate This Post
Rate The Educational Value
Rate The Ease of Understanding and Presentation
Interesting or Boring? Rate the Entertainment Value